New Delhi, August 28
Mughal emperor Babur neither visited Ayodhya nor ordered demolition of the temple to construct a mosque in 1528 at the disputed Ram Janmbhoomi-Babri masjid site, a Hindu body claimed in the Supreme Court on Wednesday.
“Akhil Bhartiya Sri Ram Janam Bhoomi Punarudhar Samiti", a defendant in a lawsuit filed by a Muslim party in the case, referred to the historical books like “Tuzuk-i-Baburi or Baburnama”, “Humayunnama”, “Akbarnama” and “Tuzuk-i-Jahangiri” before a five-judge Constitution Bench, headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, to highlight its point that none of these talked about the existence of Babri masjid.
Advancing submissions on the 14th day of the decades-old case, senior advocate P N Mishra, appearing for the Hindu body, said these books, specially "Baburnama", did not talk about either destruction of the temple or construction of the Babri mosque in Ayodhjya by Mir Baki, the commander of the first Mughal emperor.
"Babur did not enter Ayodhya and therefore, he had no occasion to direct demolition of the temple and construction of the mosque in 1528 AD and moreover, there was no person with the name of Mir Baqi as his commander," Mishra told the Bench which also comprised Justices SA Bobde, DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer.
Mir Baki was not the commander who had led the invasion on Ayodhya, Mishra said leading the Bench to ask him as to what he was trying to prove by referring to these historical books. Mishra said that 'Baburnama' deals with the 18 years of life of the emperor, but does not talk about any mosque at Ayodhya and moreover, when the so-called mosque was ordered to be constructed, the king was in Agra. — PTI
from The Tribune https://ift.tt/2MKD1tO
via Today’s News Headlines
No comments: